Safety is Key to Novel CRISPR Medicines

With the Nobel Prize in Chemistry being awarded to the founding mothers of CRISPR - Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna - genome editing is talk of the town. But before novel CRISPR medicines can move into the clinic, some safety issues have to be solved. We have previously discussed these critical issues with Roberto Nitsch and Marcello Maresca at AstraZeneca, and to remind everybody about safety in CRISPR these two interviews will be Open Access for one week until October 19 2020.

By: Gorm Palmgren - Oct. 12, 2020
Roberto Nitsch (left) and Marcello Maresca (right) are safety and associate directors, respectively,...
Roberto Nitsch (left) and Marcello Maresca (right) are safety and associate directors, respectively, at AstraZeneca. Images courtesy of Roberto Nitsch and Marcello Maresca.

In October last year, we did an interview with Safety Director Roberto Nitsch at AstraZeneca, where he is focusing on the safety of potential future gene therapy initiatives. To most people, the safety of CRISPR is probably mainly a question about off-target editing, but Nitsch has a broader view:

»There are three key safety issues related to CRISPR Cas9 that the scientific community is studying right now. First off-target and on-target rearrangements, second intrinsic immunogenicity of Cas9, and third a p53 mediated response to double-strand breaks,« he says.

We need to develop better technologies and address the safety issuesRoberto Nitsch

Nitsch also emphasises the safety concerns of both viral and non-viral delivery vectors. He believes, it is a common misconception that viral vectors are associated with more safety concerns than non-viral vectors, and he reminds that lipid nanoparticles also can generate an inflammatory response.

Read our full interview with Roberto Nitsch here.

Schematic illustrating the two-step VIVO method. In step I, CIRCLE-seq identifies off-target sites...
Schematic illustrating the two-step VIVO method. In step I, CIRCLE-seq identifies off-target sites cleaved in vitro. In step II, the sites identified in step I are assessed in vivo for indel mutations by targeted amplicon sequencing performed with genomic DNA isolated from the livers of nuclease-treated mice. Illustration from Nature.

Identification of off-targets leads to better guide RNAs

In February, we also talked to Marcello Maresca, who is Associate Director at AstraZeneca. Maresca is a corresponding author of a Nature paper from 2018 that describes a strategy to identify genome-wide off-target effects of CRISPR–Cas nucleases in vivo. The approach is called VIVO, and it is a useful tool in the design of guide RNAs.

»We find that with a well-designed guide targeting the PCSK9 gene, we tend to have no detectable off-target mutations in vivo,« Maresca explains. However, he also agrees with Roberto Nitsch that off-target editing is only part of the problems that need to be addressed with CRISPR medicines.

When we can make a better target, we can make drugs that can better treat diseasesMarcello Maresca

Maresca believes that it is essential to identify and validate suitable targets when developing new drugs. And that is the main reason that AstraZeneca is using CRISPR.

»One of the reasons why many drug projects fail is not because we don't develop good drugs, but because we don't have good targets. So we tend now to use CRISPR to come up with good targets - that is, a target that, if modulated by a drug, will treat the pathological consequences of the disease,« he says.

Read our full interview with Marcello Maresca here.

Tags

HashtagArticleHashtagCas9HashtagCrisprHashtagCrisprmedicineHashtagCRISPR-CasHashtagGenome editingHashtagMethodHashtagNewsHashtagOff-targetHashtagSafety

close
Search CRISPR Medicine