Researchers have developed CasPlus, a CRISPR-Cas9 variant with T4 DNA polymerase, to improve gene editing safety and precision. CasPlus reduces on-target large deletions and chromosomal translocations, increasing precise 1- to 2-base-pair insertions. It efficiently corrected DMD mutations, restoring dystrophin expression, and showed enhanced safety in mouse germline editing and primary human T cells, offering a safer, more efficient gene editing tool.
Researchers have discovered that miR-203, an epigenetically regulated microRNA, is crucial for trigeminal ganglion formation in chick embryos. Using CRISPR-Cas9 and miR-203 sponging, they showed that neural crest cells secrete miR-203, which is then incorporated into placode cells via extracellular vesicles. Overexpression of miR-203 led to ectopic coalescence and increased ganglion size, highlighting intercellular communication’s role in ganglion development.
French researchers have used CRISPR-Cas9 to reactivate fetal haemoglobin (HbF) to treat sickle cell disease (SCD). Targeting LRF repressor sites in γ-globin promoters, they achieved robust HbF synthesis in healthy donor and SCD-derived HSPCs. While maintaining differentiation, SCD cells showed reduced engraftment and a myeloid bias. Increased off-target activity and upregulation of DNA damage and inflammatory genes were observed, highlighting the need for thorough safety studies.
Researchers have developed a novel strategy to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) by combining gene supplementation with CRISPR genome editing. The study employs a CRISPR-Cas9-based homology-independent targeted integration (HITI) strategy to correct the SMA mutation in mice in conjunction with Smn1 cDNA supplementation. HITI, effective in both dividing and non-dividing cells, uses non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) to integrate transgenes, ensuring stable gene correction without the need for homologous recombination.
Chinese researchers have demonstrated the feasibility of using RNA molecules as repair templates for homologous recombination in mammalian cells. By fusing RNA templates to the 3´-end of sgRNA, they created a single RNA molecule to target gene editing. This approach showed successful gene editing and highlighted that longer homologous arms and inducing an R-loop near the double-strand break (DSB) enhance repair efficiency.
Researchers have developed a one-tube assay combining RT-RPA and CRISPR-Cas12a to detect human metapneumovirus (HMPV). By targeting the nucleoprotein gene, this assay achieves rapid visual detection at one copy/μL in 30 minutes, showing 98.53% concordance with quantitative RT-PCR. This method, which avoids cross-reactivity with other respiratory pathogens, offers a simplified and efficient platform for early HMPV detection.
Reviews
Coding, or non-coding, that is the question. This review, among other topics, highlights the use of CRISPR-Cas gene editing technology to surgically alter miRNA response elements (MREs) in mRNAs, disrupting their competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) function.
Gene drives: an alternative approach to malaria control? This review discusses the use and progress of gene drives for vector control, particularly malaria. It also addresses the limitations and ethics of using gene drives for mosquito control.
Researchers highlight the security risks of genome editing despite its medical benefits. They call for an integrated approach to regulate and prevent misuse, noting insufficient focus on dual-use concerns in the WHO’s 2021 framework. Proposed steps include 1) integrating genome editing into security strategies, 2) enhancing international dialogue, 3) creating a global verification mechanism, and 4) tracking genome editing technologies.
A perspective in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology explores the structural and biochemical intricacies that govern the functionality of CRISPR–Cas technologies. The author emphasizes the need for a nuanced mechanistic understanding to overcome current limitations and pave the way for safer and more effective genome-editing applications in medicine and research. The author argues that uncovering the rate-limiting biochemical and enzymatic mechanisms of genome-editing technologies will broaden existing horizons and lead to the development of new tools to modify the genome.